That being said, I've always thought it was an interesting decision of Tolkien's to divide up The Two Towers into Book 4 being exclusively Frodo and Sam's journey and Book 3 containing the events related to the rest of the Fellowship. I understand this choice on an organizational level since Frodo and Sam are isolated from the rest of the group so it makes more sense to put their whole story together. However, it does leave me a little confused in regards to the timeline of events since the split-up perspectives don't make this too clear, although Tolkien does ensure to include how time passes by mentioning how many days have passed, etc. Ultimately, understanding how different events align doesn't really matter since everyone miraculously and conveniently ends up in Mordor at the same time in The Return of the King.
These are just some ideas that occurred to me after our discussion on Tuesday. I'd be interested to know anyone else's thoughts on this!
Hello!
ReplyDeleteI love how you explained the different perspectives and point of views because they really do affect how the story is told and the information readers are given. The story would have been completely different and had a different vibe if the perspectives were changed up which is honestly pretty cool that the story can be affected by such a small yet significant detail.