After watching and listening to all the multimedia projects,
one thing that stuck out to me was just how many different styles and methods
we used to present the information about the stories, history, and life
connections to Tolkien that we had discovered in our research. Some groups created
podcast-esque presentations, others used a more formal bullet-points and associated
speech, and others used imagery to emphasize points (of course, all projects
contained aspects of more than just one of these categories). This made me
wonder about the many ways Tolkien writes for his different literature.
The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth was written in a very “radio-drama”
manner, while keeping many of the alliterative and rhyme aspects of the way the
original poem was written.
The Hobbit, Farmer Giles of Ham, and Smith of Wootton Major
all have aspects of “children’s bedtime story” to them, and the art styles for
Farmer Giles and Smith of Wootton Major (as well as some of the drawings for The
Hobbit) are created to have a very medieval feel.
The Silmarillion is meant to contain and provide history for
Middle Earth, and both it and the Lord of the Rings begin with a history
textbook-esque method of providing readers with information.
Each method Tolkien uses for his works provides a very
specific feel for the works and changes how they behave as pieces in the wider
world of literature. If the Silmarillion were written as a children’s bedtime
story, the purpose of the stories would change drastically, as would the amount
of information. If the story of Turin Turambar were told for children, Tolkien
might have decided to leave out the three suicides and instead have a happier
ending. If The Hobbit were meant to sound more like Beowulf, would Bilbo have
been our hero? Or would Tolkien have chosen to follow Thorin, the King returning
to claim his throne only to fall at the end of his journey?
We’ve played around with removing seemingly “unimportant”
sections of Tolkien’s works, seeing how that might change his overall messages,
but I think it would be interesting to look at changing the overall styles of his
stories, and how that would impact the messages and themes overall.
“In a hole in the fabric of the universe there lived a god.
Now, this was not one of those minor gods of bedtime stories
or petty wars for heaven; this was the One God, all-loving and all-knowing, who
created the world – only he hadn’t created the world just yet, which is why he
was sitting in a hole in the fabric of the universe.”
(Credit: Tumblr user "lintamande-reblogs")
This is a really interesting idea. I love messing around with how information is presented to its audience. I think though that Tolkien believed children to be able to understand things on a level which adults could not, and so he didn't specifically label any of his works only for adults or only for children. Children can still understand the feeling of fellowship in LOTR and Frodo's feelings of being overwhelmed and hopless.
ReplyDeleteI do think Tolkien intentionally gave the Silmarillion a more biblical feel because it is a creation story. And while stories like Farmer Giles of Ham are more childish in nature it still has themes and ideas which can be understood by both adults and children. Take for example how the main character treats Garm; abuse is a very adult topic and yet it is in a "children's" story.